I’ve gone on a fiction reading binge while lounging on the beach this past week. There’s no better way to re-energize after a taxing school year than to sit in a beach chair beside the ocean, inhale the salty air, soak in the not-yet-too-hot sun, massage the feet in the sand, and escape via literary pages. Perdido Key provided the sand and surf, and Stephanie Myers provided the pages. I did escape. Completely.
It’s been quite some time–perhaps since reading Tess of the D’Urbervilles or Madame Bovary–that a book, actually a series of three: Twilight series–touched me so deeply. I still haven’t been able to shake Edward and Bella from my subconsciousness. I find myself daydreaming about them, re-playing scenarios from the book in my head, dreaming about the fourth and final book and what will become of the pair. Will Bella ever really become a vampire? If so, will she regret it? Will she be able to see her parents ever again?…
I love the series not only because I’m a sap for love stories, but for Myers gifted writing. Two elements grabbed me, elements I plan to design a series of mini-lessons around for next school year:
- Her allusions to classical works. Engrossed in the plot, I neglected to mark up the text as I normally do. The story and characters moved me: I neglected to read like a writer. So–I will dive back into the pages to hash out the details here, but, from memory, two stand out: Romeo and Juliet and Catherine and Heathcliff (from Wuthering Heights). In both instances she parallels Edward and Bella to these classical romantic duos, establishing the parallel as a motif. She creatively quotes from the classical texts, one time having Edward read a Bronte passage aloud to Bella, another time having Bella re-read a passage she has dog-eared in her well-worn copy of the text. I found it fascinating: Myers’ allusion sets up a metaphor that she traces throughout the book, establishing a motif. What better text to use to teach these three literary terms? A degree in English literature, there’s no doubt Myers carefully and purposefully crafted the alluson/metaphor/motif.
- She uses stacked metaphors/similes. Yes–I’m coining this phrase, one that came to me in a dream (no lie–I really have been obsessed with these books!). Myers frequently uses a string of similes or metaphors, rather than a single one as if she’s piling up comparisons, stacking one on top of another. These stacks allow her to share multi-dimensional insights into a concept or a character-like a triple mirror in a clothing store, like a storyteller shifting point of view, like a Gardner inspired lesson appealing to mutiple intelligences.
So, added to my summer to-do list is creating lessons that use excerpts from MyersTwilight series as anchor texts to explore this stacking metaphors technique and to teach a few literary elements.
Of course, like thousands of other Twilight fans, I’m anxiously awaiting the fourth and final book and hoping the movie–now in the making–doesn’t fall too short (it can never capture the artistry of Myers’ language).
Enamored as I am with Myers, I promptly rushed to a bookstore on our off-beach day to purchase The Host, her latest release, an adult science fiction. It’s good. It didn’t move me like Edward and Bella, but it’s still a good read.
polliwog
June 25, 2008
I firmly agree with your take on the series. However, no discussion could begin to be complete without mentioning my personal favorite – Alice. Vampire or pixie? Clearly a side character who took on a life of her own, possibly to Myers own surprise, and clearly inserted herself firmly into the mix as a lead player. Alice is by no means an ordinary dish in this feast. She is a molder and a shaper who is just as captivating as Edward and Bella.
lhuff
June 26, 2008
@polliwog: Funny–my husband is fan of Alice too (yes–I talked so much about the books he decided he had to read them!). I’m intrigued about Alice’s “special power.” Apparently, the power relates to some human characteristic: Alice was in a mental hospital before being bitten, people of her time thinking her premonitions made her certifiable. So–if becoming a vampire enhances a trait already present to some degree, what–if any–power will Bella have? I’m wondering if she’ll be immune to extreme blood lust. She’s worrying about being a total freak the first few years, thinking only of blood, but, as a human, she can’t stand the sight of blood. I can’t wait until August to find out!
polliwog
July 1, 2008
True! Very True. That happens to be my theory as well concerning Alice. However, concerning Bella, will Jacob and the pack allow her the chance to get what she wants? She can not be the one for Jacob – no imprint! Personally, I fear she will never be bitten, but if she is – would the Cullens be able to keep her and her powers out of the grasp of the Voltouri? Would her distaste for blood keep her from feeding period once bitten? We may never know the answer to the second question as the “series” is suppose to end after the “side book” she has been writing on Edward comes out after book four. By the way, I reserved my copy of #4 – Breaking Dawn – about a month ago. Amazon will ship immediately.
Rumor has it Meyer is going to work “The Host” and its characters as her next series. I plan on reading “Host” on my vacation in July. I find it hard to believe publishers will allow her to walk away from the profitable Twilight books. Especially if the movie proves popular. We shall see.
As a side note, I plan on trying to do a blog on a book I just read. I hope you find it interesting. I believe it should be a required read in high school!
justread
July 1, 2008
No imprint? Hmmm. I’ll have to go back re-read. I assumed (I guess inferred would be the correct teacherly term) Bella was his imprint. Remember the scene where Bella and Jacob are kissing and she sees them in the future with little kiddos. I assumed this glimpse was tied to Jacob’s powers–that he had somehow made her see their future together. I anxiously await your post. I’m always looking for good books.
polliwog
July 1, 2008
Ah, that is just it. The imprint has to go both ways. It is like Sam having no choice in his mate and vice versa. Even knowing the danger, Sam’s wife can see no other. The same held true for the other boy who imprinted on the little infant girl. There was no choice for any of them. It goes both ways and is just as strong.
I will give you Bella may be just as immune to the imprint as she is to the powers the other characters possess. However, if Jacob was linked to Bella with a consuming love, he could have never played her the way he did when they were in the mountains. He would be just as careful with her as Sam is with his mate. He couldn’t have used her as a pawn to hurt Edward because he would know it would hurt her too. He couldn’t do that.
In considering Bella’s mind, it is always in an ever changing state of flux. Jacob wouldn’t have to press Bella very hard to have her “seeing” a life with him. Afterall, a “family”- a “family life” is something she has always yearned for but never had in her grasp. She was her mothers keeper. Her dad was always a mess. Her mind could easily fathom the relationship to Jacob, but her heart is and has always been firmly Edwards. Why else would she have him in her mind when she was in danger or with Jacob?
Jacob also has made it seem fairly clear that he wants Bella, but more importantly wants Edward not to have her. That is in my mind his primary attaction to Bella and motivation for the relationship. He wants to have what his enemy desires. Not an act of an imprinted man.
lhuff
July 2, 2008
@Polliwog: A compelling argument. You’ve convinced me. That–giving Jacob a mate–would allow for the happy ending I’m thinking Myers wants to give readers.
Christian Long
July 8, 2008
Been mulling over the idea of reading this series since a # of my 10th grade students (all girls at this point, I think) are huge fans. Read all of A. Rice’s Interview series ages ago, so perhaps it’ll be an interesting connection for me after all these years.
Intrigued by how you’re approaching this on the English teacher front, esp. re: metaphors, et al. Thanks for the inspiration, ideas, head scratch!
lhuff
July 8, 2008
@Christian: You really must read them. They’re not just for adoslescent girls. Several HS boys at my school have read–and loved–them. My husband loved them. Polliwog–the male blogger above–loves them. Myers’ language is rich, making any English teacher appreciate her craft as well as her plot. With the fourth book debuting right before the start of school and the movie in December, I’m hoping these mini-lessons (and the Google Maps Lit trip if I can pull it off) will be of high-interest to students.
Hellen Harvey
November 26, 2008
I’m sorry. I read Twilight and while it is a sexy little bit of escapism – I regard it as young adult soft porn. That a Mormon writing a thinly disguised diatribe on abstinence only sex has escape “astute” readers appalls me. You have been duped!
lhuff
December 1, 2008
@Helen: I think Myers insisting on abstinence is noble. Edward’s sense of nobility, his wanting to protect Bella’s honor is a noble and endearing trait–one that made me adore Edward all the more. Myers’ message of abstinence is one our generation needs to hear–how growing love and a lasting relationship comes not from sexual intimacy but from an intimacy of the heart.